Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct Evidence Over Motive in Murder Conviction


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of an accused for committing a daylight murder, emphasizing the primacy of direct ocular evidence over establishing the motive behind the crime. The bench comprising Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and PB Varale underscored that when there is credible eyewitness testimony, the absence of a motive becomes inconsequential.


Direct Evidence Trumps Motive

The court's ruling asserted that if direct ocular evidence inspires confidence, the prosecution need not prove the motive of the accused. Quoting the precedent set in *Shivaji Genu Mohite v. State of Maharashtra*, the court highlighted that in cases with reliable eyewitnesses, the significance of motive diminishes.


Case Overview

The appellant faced charges under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for committing a daylight murder. The sole eyewitness to the incident provided a detailed account of the events leading to the crime, corroborating the prosecution's case. Additionally, a blood-stained knife recovered from the accused matched the blood of the deceased, as confirmed by forensic analysis.


Verdict and Reasoning

Upon reviewing the evidence, the court affirmed the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. Noting the swift sequence of events, including the murder, the arrest, and the recovery of the incriminating weapon, the court dismissed any doubts regarding the appellant's culpability.


Dismissal of Appeal

Based on the compelling evidence presented by the prosecution, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and directed the appellant to surrender before the Trial Court to serve the remaining portion of the sentence.


Conclusion

The judgment in the case of Chandan v. The State (Delhi Admn.) reaffirms the principle that in cases with direct evidence, the absence of a motive does not undermine the credibility of eyewitness testimony. By prioritizing direct ocular evidence, the court ensures justice is served swiftly and effectively, maintaining the integrity of the legal process.


                                                                                                        -SHASHA JAIN

Advocate

www.bljlegali.in

Comments